PSG vs Monaco: The Press Ratings Are Harsh!

PSG–Monaco: the press delivers tough ratings, while VIPSG.fr sees a completely different match. Despite the draw, Paris secured qualification, and that is what truly matters. Especially after coming from behind once again, just like in the first leg.

Paris Saint-Germain confirmed their qualification against AS Monaco (2-2), but individual performances were not judged the same way by observers. Between the ratings from Le Parisien, L’Équipe and VIPSG, the gap is sometimes striking.

- Advertisement -

National Media Deliver Much Harsher Player Ratings

In the national press, the evaluations remain generally modest. Safonov received a 4.5 from Le Parisien and a 5 from L’Équipe. In defense, Pacho was particularly targeted with a 4 in Le Parisien and a harsh 3 in L’Équipe.

Marquinhos and Nuno Mendes were capped at 5, while Hakimi did not exceed that mark either. In midfield, João Neves fared best with a 6 in both newspapers. Vitinha and Zaïre-Emery were marked down (5 in Le Parisien, 4 in L’Équipe for Vitinha). Up front, Barcola (4.5 and 5) and Kvaratskhelia (5 and 4) were only half-convincing despite the Georgian’s goal. Doué earned a 5 in both outlets. Even coach Luis Enrique had to settle for a 5 in L’Équipe.

- Advertisement -

VIPSG.fr’s assessment is far more positive. Hakimi was named man of the match with an 8, praised for his relentless energy and attacking influence. Kvaratskhelia (7.5) was highlighted for his crucial goal and second-half impact. Vitinha (7) was described as the conductor in midfield, while Marquinhos (7) was commended for his equalizer and leadership. Pacho (6.5) and Safonov (6), criticized elsewhere, were considered solid.

Doué (7) was rewarded for his assist, and even Barcola, despite his lack of efficiency, earned a 6 for his dynamism and shot off the crossbar. In the end, two visions clash: the press focuses on inaccuracies and overall nervousness, while VIPSG emphasizes the collective response and the impact of key players in decisive moments. One match, two analyses… and press ratings that are very, very harsh.

- Advertisement -

Related Posts:

Share This Article